What makes Kingsman so easy, with all concentrations in this luscious fight scenes and action? What distinguishes it from the representatives of the genres of superhero movies and the eccentric action-Comedy? Why it is not similar to “Agents of A. N. K. L.” or the “Men in Black”? After all, we see the same humor, the same protagonists who want to save the world from international villains [*evil laughter in the background*].
Perhaps, all business in a well – designed scenarios and clearly marked with the genre though, many of the great critics of modernity could safely say that the film is one continuous tale with poor jokes and with the application of sci-Fi. But still, the main emphasis of the Director and the writers did a humorous piece, and not on food for thought with a glass of whiskey. After the whole absurdity of the first scene the Director puts before us the condition for the film not to be taken seriously, and it is better to relax the brain and get pleasure from the bright colors and creative installation than Kingsman and avoided the effect of fatigue.
The film has everything: from the simple action scenes level, “Deadpool” and “fast and Furious” to internal experiences of the protagonist, from a well-structured plot to the absurd extreme, from primitive bloopers to high-quality decorations.
In addition, the film was not without derision actual social problems, including negative attitudes towards the current President of the United States and fashion in drugs from the Millennials (and Elton John, who decided to practice kung fu and his obscene lexicon).
In short, a worthy continuation of the first partand no claims for humor, plot and actors.
7 out of 10